It looks as if Peter Singer is at it again. This time he is suggesting that Obamacare mandate the killing of severely disabled infants. Should this be so shocking though? Isn’t this just the natural progression and logical conclusion Darwinism? The bigger question is whether the general population would put up with such policies. . .
Singer responded by saying the killing of infants would be “quite reasonable” if it saved money that can be used for better purposes. He contended that most people would say they don’t want their premiums to be higher “so that infants who can experience zero quality of life can have expensive treatments.”
Read, Princeton professor calls for killing disabled infants under Obamacare
Latest posts by Aaron (see all)
- Book Review – Vindicating the Vixens by Sandra Glahn - February 8, 2018
- Book Review – Leaving Mormonism: Why Four Scholars Changed Their Minds by Corey Miller & Lynn K. Wilder - December 2, 2017
- Book Review – Marriage God’s Way by Scott LaPierre - November 17, 2017
Sad. This is shocking but probably shouldn’t be.